Efficient Algorithm for Solving n×n Array Puzzle

AI systems can already generate efficient code for puzzles like this. In fact, here’s an outline of the reasoning and a sample Python solution.


Why the Puzzle Is Solvable Exactly When the Sum Is 0 mod n

Each allowed move preserves the total sum modulo n. In detail:

  • Row/column rotations: These only rearrange the entries, so the total sum stays the same.
  • Row/column additions: Adding 1 to an entire row (or column) increases the total by n, which is 0 modulo n. Thus if you start with a total that isn’t 0 modulo n, you can never reach an array where every entry is the same (because in a constant array every entry equals some value k so that the total is n²·k, which is 0 modulo n).Conversely, if the sum is 0 modulo n, one may show by a constructive argument that there exists a sequence of allowed moves transforming the array into a constant one. In essence, by first “rotating” each row so that the differences between entries in a row match those of a chosen base row, the matrix is “aligned” in the sense that every row becomes a cyclic shift of the first row. Then, because the row‐ and column‐addition moves add a uniform amount to each row or column, one can “cancel” the differences and bring all entries to the same final value.

An Efficient Python Program

Below is a Python program that implements a constructive solution. It first checks the necessary condition (total sum ≡ 0 mod n), then finds appropriate row rotations (by matching the “difference pattern” of the first row) and finally computes the number of row and column additions needed.

python

def solve_puzzle(matrix): """ Solves the n×n puzzle where allowed moves are: (1) rotate a row, (2) rotate a column, (3) add 1 to all entries in a row, (4) add 1 to all entries in a column. Returns a list of moves (as tuples) that transforms the matrix into a constant matrix, or an empty list if no solution is possible. """ n = len(matrix) total = sum(sum(row) for row in matrix) if total % n != 0: print("No solution possible: total sum is not 0 modulo n.") return [] moves = [] # --- Step 1: Row rotations --- # We fix row 0 as our base. Compute its difference pattern. base = matrix[0] base_diffs = [base[j] - base[0] for j in range(n)] row_rotations = [0] * n # record rotation for each row (0 means no rotation) rotated_rows = [None] * n rotated_rows[0] = base[:] # no rotation for row 0 # For each other row, find a rotation so that its differences match base_diffs. for i in range(1, n): found = False for r in range(n): rotated = matrix[i][r:] + matrix[i][:r] # Compute differences relative to the first element in the rotated row. diffs = [rotated[j] - rotated[0] for j in range(n)] if diffs == base_diffs: row_rotations[i] = r rotated_rows[i] = rotated found = True break if not found: print(f"No valid rotation found for row {i}. No solution possible.") return [] # Record the row rotation moves. for i in range(n): if row_rotations[i] != 0: # A positive shift r means "rotate row i to the left by r" moves.append(("rotate_row", i, row_rotations[i])) # --- Step 2: Compute row and column additions --- # After rotations, each row i becomes: B[i] where B[i][j] = B[i][0] + (base[j] - base[0]). # Let r_i = B[i][0]. To equalize rows, we can add (max(r_i) - r_i) to row i. r_vals = [row[0] for row in rotated_rows] R_max = max(r_vals) row_adds = [R_max - r for r in r_vals] # For the columns: note that in the base row the j-th entry is base[j] = base[0] + delta_j. # To cancel out these differences, add (max(delta) - delta) to column j, # where delta[j] = base[j] - base[0] and max(delta) is the maximum value among these. delta = [base[j] - base[0] for j in range(n)] D_max = max(delta) col_adds = [D_max - d for d in delta] # Define the final target: after row additions and column additions, every cell becomes: # (B[i][0] + (base[j]-base[0])) + (R_max - B[i][0]) + (D_max - (base[j]-base[0])) = R_max + D_max. target = R_max + D_max # Record row addition moves. for i in range(n): for _ in range(row_adds[i]): moves.append(("add_row", i)) # Record column addition moves. for j in range(n): for _ in range(col_adds[j]): moves.append(("add_col", j)) return moves # --- Example Usage --- if __name__ == "__main__": # Example 3x3 matrix. matrix = [ [3, 1, 2], [2, 3, 1], [1, 2, 3] ] solution = solve_puzzle(matrix) if solution: print("Solution moves:") for move in solution: print(move) else: print("No solution exists for the given matrix.")


How the Code Works

  • Checking the Invariant:
    The code first checks that the total sum of the matrix is 0 modulo n. If not, it prints that no solution is possible.
  • Row Rotations:
    The first row is used as a base. For each other row, the program searches for a cyclic rotation that makes the differences (between each entry and the first entry) identical to those of the base row. This “alignment” is crucial because the row‐ and column‐addition moves cannot change the differences between entries in the same row.
  • Row and Column Additions:
    Once the rows are aligned, let each rotated row’s first entry be rir_iri. By adding (max⁡iri−ri)(max_i r_i - r_i)(maxiri−ri) to row iii, all rows become equal in their first column. At the same time, differences in the base row (which appear in every row) are canceled out by adding to each column an appropriate number of 1’s.
  • Output:
    The program outputs a list of moves. Each move is represented as a tuple. For example, ("rotate_row", i, r) means rotate row iii to the left by rrr positions, and ("add_row", i) means add 1 to every entry in row iii.

Conclusion

The puzzle’s structure makes it possible to decide in advance (via the mod n invariant) whether a solution exists, and the algorithm above shows a constructive way to solve it. AI systems (including current ones) are already capable of reasoning through problems like this and generating efficient code.Does this answer your question about when (and how) AI can handle such puzzles?