Pathological Analysis of Mediastinal Mass with Rhabdoid Features

This is certainly a challenging case. Let's go through the findings step-by-step to help frame the differential diagnosis and the appropriate next steps in the workup.

Key Findings:

  • Patient profile: 55-year-old male with a smoking history and a large aggressive mediastinal mass extending into the lungs.
  • Cytology: The cells are discohesive with rhabdoid features and pleomorphism, but without squamous or glandular differentiation.
  • Immunohistochemistry results:
  • Negative for: Keratins (very rare staining), S100, CD45, TTF-1, p40, Desmin, ERG, CD31, OCT3/4, CD30, CD15, SOX10.
  • Positive for: CD34 and SALL4.

Initial Interpretation:

  • Rhabdoid Features: The rhabdoid morphology suggests that this could be a high-grade malignant tumor with undifferentiated features. Rhabdoid cells often evoke concern for high-grade malignancies such as epithelioid sarcomas, rhabdoid tumors, or undifferentiated carcinomas.
  • Negative Keratin and Lineage Markers: The absence of keratin (with only very rare staining) and other epithelial markers (e.g., TTF-1, p40) suggests that this is likely not a carcinoma. The negativity for mesenchymal markers (Desmin, SOX10) also makes certain sarcomas less likely.
  • Positive for CD34 and SALL4: These markers are key.
  • CD34 positivity is often seen in vascular tumors (e.g., angiosarcomas), soft tissue tumors (e.g., solitary fibrous tumors), or hematopoietic tumors.
  • SALL4 is a marker of germ cell tumors (specifically yolk sac tumors or other non-seminomatous tumors) but can also be expressed in some undifferentiated malignancies. The negative OCT3/4 and SOX10 rule out a classic seminoma, but SALL4 points us toward a possible extragonadal germ cell tumor (EGGCT).

Working Hypothesis:

Given the mediastinal location (a common site for extragonadal germ cell tumors in adults), the SALL4 positivity, and CD34 expression, this could represent a poorly differentiated or non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, possibly with a yolk sac tumor component. The lack of squamous, glandular, or clear sarcomatous differentiation helps narrow the diagnosis to an undifferentiated form of germ cell tumor.

Next Steps in Workup:

  • Serum Markers:

  • AFP (Alpha-fetoprotein) and beta-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) should be ordered. These are critical markers for yolk sac tumors and choriocarcinoma, respectively. Elevated levels would support a diagnosis of a germ cell tumor.

  • Further IHC:

  • Consider additional markers like Glypican-3, which can support the diagnosis of a yolk sac tumor.

  • PLAP (Placental alkaline phosphatase) could be ordered, although it's more common in seminomas and embryonal carcinomas, which seem less likely here.

  • Molecular Studies: If the diagnosis remains unclear, molecular testing to identify characteristic mutations or chromosomal alterations (e.g., 12p amplification, often seen in germ cell tumors) could be helpful.

  • Radiology Correlation: Imaging of the testicles should be considered to rule out a primary gonadal germ cell tumor with metastasis, although the mediastinal mass in isolation strongly suggests an extragonadal germ cell tumor.

Final Differential Diagnosis:

  • Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumor (likely with a yolk sac component given the SALL4 positivity and morphology).
  • Solitary Fibrous Tumor with aberrant expression of SALL4 (less likely, but CD34 positivity warrants consideration).
  • Undifferentiated Sarcoma or Dedifferentiated Tumor with aberrant marker expression (unlikely given the strong SALL4 positivity).

Summary:

The findings strongly suggest an extragonadal germ cell tumor, possibly with yolk sac differentiation. The CD34 positivity may be secondary and not indicative of a primary vascular or mesenchymal tumor. Further workup with serum markers, additional IHC, and molecular studies will help solidify the diagnosis.Let me know if you'd like to go into further detail or explore other diagnostic possibilities!